Effective performance of T(1)-weighted FLAIR Imaging with BLADE in pediatric brains.

PURPOSE In magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, BLADE is used to compensate for head motion. The technique focuses mainly on acquisition of T(2)-weighted or contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted images in adults; its utility for nonenhanced T(1)-weighted imaging in children is not well established. We compared the quality of T(1)-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery brain imaging with BLADE (T(1)-FLAIR-BLADE) to that of conventional spin-echo T(1)-weighted imaging (T(1)-SE) in pediatric patients who cannot stay still during MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our investigation included a volunteer study and a retrospective clinical study. Six healthy adult volunteers underwent scanning to compare the contrast of T(1)-SE, T(1)-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging (T(1)-FLAIR), and T(1)-FLAIR-BLADE at both 1.5 and 3 tesla. Comparison was based on scores assigned independently by 2 blinded observers and by calculated contrast-to-noise ratio. The clinical study included 20 children who underwent both T(1)-SE and T(1)-FLAIR-BLADE at either 1.5 (n = 9) or 3 T (n = 11). On each sequence, 2 blinded observers independently scored visualization of the cerebral gyri and contrast between gray and white matter. We compared scores between sequences separately for 1.5 and 3T using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS At both 1.5 and 3T, contrast was better using T(1)-FLAIR and T(1)-FLAIR-BLADE than T(1)-SE in volunteers, and overall scores were significantly higher with T(1)-FLAIR-BLADE (P < 0.05) than T(1)-SE in the clinical study. CONCLUSION T(1)-FLAIR-BLADE may be superior to T(1)-SE in demonstrating brain structures in children who cannot stay still and may be used to supplement or replace T(1)-SE when T(1)-SE is insufficient for patient motion.